Ancelotti's Reply on the Dani Olmo Case: Clear and Strong Message to FC Barcelona
The hard blow Barcelona has received after Ancelotti's recent opinion about another ridiculous Barça
The winter market has begun, bringing with it the opportunity for Barcelona to make another historic blunder. Olmo, who joined the club last summer, may leave for free after being unable to be registered. This situation has sparked various opinions, with Ancelotti offering some words on the matter.
"The only thing I can say is that the rules must be respected," were the words of the Italian coach. In a recent press conference, Ancelotti made it clear that no team is exempt from breaking the law. This clearly includes Barcelona due to the questionable actions it has done in the past.
The Barça club continues to fight to avoid losing a player for whom it paid 60 million euros, but the outlook is not favorable. They are close to receiving justice for an incident that once again demonstrates their poor situation and management.
Ancelotti's stick
Suffering a severe financial crisis for several seasons, Barcelona keeps making historic ridicule. From thrashings that are still remembered to failed transfer attempts, the club has always found a way to fall into disgrace. The Olmo case is just the latest in a long list that shows the club's incompetitiveness.
In light of this, Ancelotti has been very clear about the reality Barcelona is facing and the actions to be taken. The regulations, as the coach himself mentioned, exist to be respected by each and every team.
Despite everything Barcelona has done to avoid losing Olmo, the right thing is for the player to end up leaving the team. This is the opportunity for La Liga to finally demonstrate the seriousness and firmness with which it adheres to the rules.
Justice for the Culés
Following Ancelotti's words, it's only a matter of time before a resolution is reached in the case of Dani Olmo. The player, unfortunately, fell for the deceptions of a team that won't be able to perform the same actions as in the past to solve this case.
More posts: