Pedrerol Responds to Edu Aguirre about Laporta and Dani: The Race Hasn't Finished
The host of "El Chiringuito" gives a surprising reply about the controversy
Laporta managed to bypass the rules again and get the provisional measure for Dani Olmo and Pau Victor. Despite having months, they wanted to do everything at the last minute and arrived late. They had missed the deadline, but the CSD will allow them to register until a decision is made.
They discussed this on El Chiringuito, and Edu Aguirre was very critical of what happened. "I don't know how many times the CSD has put itself ahead and has disregarded LaLiga and the Federation in this way," he pointed out. A harsh blow, but it was going to go further.
In fact, he pointed out that "what can't be is the ridiculous wording of the CSD" to grant them the provisional measure. The list of arguments was that "Barça because it is involved in a Supercopa that has a global impact. That it would be a terrible financial detriment."
They also indicated: "They reach the Supercopa because they had a good previous season." These seem like very weak arguments that Pedrerol didn't like either. "The explanation is a bit... the one who wrote it hasn't finished their degree," he replied.
Edu Aguirre makes two very controversial comments about Barça and the CSD
First, he referred to Barça's president and assured that "I like Laporta. He gives me a show, it's a liberation." He did so in reference to his excessive celebration upon learning of the provisional measure. He added that "I don't think it's bad, I don't dislike it, it seems like an euphoric Laporta."
It's important to remember that beyond the celebratory gestures and shouts, he left two other very ugly details. First, a rude gesture that shows his total lack of respect. But also some insults thrown into the air that shouldn't go without some repercussion.
However, he also made clear that "the provisional measure seems like a real disgrace to me." He made a wish: "I hope the clubs start lining up at the CSD's door to ask about me." The precedent and the inequality caused are clear.
More posts: